My Russian colleague Aleksandr Matrosov reports that this week he received an interesting sample from forensic investigation specialists Group-IB. The threat in question is detected by ESET products as Win32/Sheldor.NAD, and coverage by other vendors is reasonable: see http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/report.html?id=9f3ff234d5481da1c00a2466bc83f7bda5fb9a36ebc0b0db821a6dc3669fe4e6-1294926672. The interesting feature of this sample is that it uses the TeamViewer 5.0 standalone component to effect remote control of the
All this is potentially frightening and inconvenient (or worse) for a home user. And if it happens in a corporate environment, it can be very, very expensive to remedy. So while some of the public comments we see in the wake of such incidents may seem over the top, “FP rage” is certainly understandable.
Pierre-Marc and I reported a few days ago that we were seeing both new malware and older families starting to incorporate the same .LNK exploit used by Win32/Stuxnet. We also predicted that “…more malware operators will start using this exploit code in order to infect host systems and increase their revenues.” Well, that was a pretty safe bet.
There was an AMTSO (Anti-Malware Testing Standards Organization) panel session here at RSA, where Larry Bridwell, Righard Zwienenberg, Andreas Marx, Roel Schouwenberg and Neil Rubenking talked about AMTSO and what it does (and what it hopes to do). And I added to my list of qualifications for being involved with the organization: current vendor representative,
En los últimos días hemos hallado un caso de malware que utiliza el nombre del popular servicio VirusTotal como medio para engañar e infectar a los usuarios. Se trata de un sitio falso (virus-total.[ELIMINADO]) en el cual se simula que pueden explorarse archivos y verificar si los mismos se encuentran infectados, lo cual es un
Over the weekend our colleagues at ESET Latin America found that Slideshare was being used to spread malware. As they haven’t found much information on the web about this, Sebastián Bortnik blogged today about what they found. (Errors in translation and interpretation should be attributed to David Harley!) I’ve added some thoughts and some content
[Since the owner of the blog described below interpreted this blog as a personal attack and marketing BS, I’ve removed information that identifies his blog. Which is a pity, because his blogs on the topic actually include useful information. I’m not withdrawing the whole blog, because it isn’t marketing and it isn’t about our product:
I’ve just been observing a slightly bizarre email thread about the whatdoestheinternetthink?net site, which is apparently aiming to be the place to go if you want a global enquiry tool to find out what the online world thinks about any given subject. You enter a search term, it submits to one or more search engines, and it