Comments on: Protecting Consumers from Rogue Online Pharmacies http://www.welivesecurity.com/2011/05/29/protecting-consumers-from-rogue-online-pharmacies/ News, Views, and Insight from the ESET Security Community Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7 By: Paul Laudanski http://www.welivesecurity.com/2011/05/29/protecting-consumers-from-rogue-online-pharmacies/#comment-3052 Tue, 31 May 2011 20:57:28 +0000 http://blog.eset.com/?p=7224#comment-3052 No doubt there is controversy:

http://www.mipa.ca/nabp-and-vipps-%E2%80%93-no-ethics-or-morals-just-their-spamming-money-grubbing-racist-hands-your-pocket

And other links may be found.  I think the goal here is to protect consumers from fake pharmaceuticals that endanger their lives. The process of which must always be improved, and this post helps to spread that awareness.

Perhaps some legitimate sites may not be recommended; however, many more fall into the rogue category than any regular consumer may track.

]]>
By: Randy Abrams http://www.welivesecurity.com/2011/05/29/protecting-consumers-from-rogue-online-pharmacies/#comment-3051 Tue, 31 May 2011 19:44:25 +0000 http://blog.eset.com/?p=7224#comment-3051 Unfortuntely, NABP is a US pharmaceutical mouthpiece and offeres some really ignorant adivce as well as blakclisting honest and legitimate international pharmacies. Just because a pharamcy appears on the "Not recommended list" it doesn't mean that they pharmacy is rogue or dishonest, it just means that NABP members do not like honest competition.

]]>